StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Human Nature According Descartes and Darwin - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
"Human Nature According Descartes and Darwin" paper explores the contrasting views of Descartes and Darwin on human nature to compare them and show why they are at odds with each other. The paper explores how history and modern science has added more weight to the views of Darwin…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.9% of users find it useful
Human Nature According Descartes and Darwin
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Human Nature According Descartes and Darwin"

?Descartes & Darwin Human nature is a complex thing, comprising of a number of psychological, biological and philosophical elements that make it difficult to define and explain. Descartes, in Discourse on the Method, suggests that human nature is so complex that it cannot be explained fully by science. Darwin, in The Descent of Man, argues that human nature can be fully explained by science and a number of evolutionary processes provide evidence for this statement. The purpose of this paper is to explore the contrasting views of Descartes and Darwin on human nature to compare them and show why they are at odds with each other. Secondly, the paper will explore how history and modern science has added more weight to the views of Darwin which suggests that this view may be more ‘correct’ in its nature. The Debate on Human Nature One of the most well-known parts of Descartes’ philosophical views is the concept that to be human is to be composed of two incompatible pieces; the body and the soul. The body is full of the natural processes, whilst the soul contains all the information that we need to be ourselves, including all of our decision-making faculties and our personalities (Descartes, 2006). These two components, perhaps communicating through the pineal gland, are thoroughly different in composition and matter. Descartes would argue that human nature is partially comprised of the soul which cannot be explained by science and therefore there are elements of ourselves that science cannot explain. Descartes did, however, suggest that “the mind depends so much on temperament and the disposition of one's bodily organs that, if it is possible to find a way to make people generally more wise and more skilful than they have been in the past, I believe that we should look for it in medicine” (Descartes, 2006, p45), meaning that there are some elements of human nature which should look to science for explanation. Charles Darwin had very different ideas. Often known as the father of evolution, Darwin explored a great number of scientific concepts pertaining to human and animal behavior, often finding that these two concepts were linked and very similar. This view can be illustrated from Darwin’s words that “it has often and confidently been asserted, that man's origin can never be known: but ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science” (Darwin, 1871, p4). This just shows Darwin’s faith in science, and the power of science to explain even the inexplicable. Human nature is no exception from this rule, and as Darwin suggests, “there is no fundamental difference between man and the higher animals in their mental faculties” (Darwin, 1971, p34). Having studied a number of animal behaviors throughout his career, it is obvious that Darwin had more interaction with different creatures and therefore more information to draw his strong conclusion about human nature from. As the father of evolution, it is obvious that Darwin will favor an evolutionary perspective of human nature, one that suggests that all elements of our behavior and other aspects of being a human can be explained by science. Although there were some gaps in the evidence Darwin provided for this hypothesis, these have been slowly filled since the publication of The Descent of Man and are continually being updated as time goes on. It is perhaps the fact that Darwin’s work fits so neatly with modern science which makes it the more appealing hypothesis, as explained further below. These views are evidently at odds with each other. Although Descartes does alert the reader to the importance of science and medicine, it is evident from Discourse on the Method that there are some things that Descartes feels are inexplicable. This may seem like a feasible resolution to come to, as human nature and personalities appear to be extremely complicated and different from those of other mammals. Darwin, however, puts things differently, suggesting that all mammals (including humans) follow a very similar pattern of behaviors, this being proof that we are all biologically linked and therefore providing evidence of a scientific explanation of human nature. The following part of this paper explains why Darwin has the more feasible idea, particularly in the context of modern science. Explaining Human Nature Evidently, there are a number of parts of both Descartes’ and Darwin’s works that make both views about the science of human nature seem feasible. However, it should be noted that Discourse on the Method predated The Descent of Man by almost two centuries, which means that The Descent of Man benefited from current scientific knowledge and technologies. Bearing this in mind, it seems obvious that Darwin’s 1871 work would be more compatible with our current scientific views of human nature and this is the reason why this view perhaps seems more correct. There have been a lot of developments in genetics and evolution which have provided reasoning for a lot of aspects of human nature and behaviors, finding that Darwin’s assertion that all mammals have similar behaviors is correct. Current scientific knowledge has provided an explanation for most aspects of human nature, with developments being made almost daily that expand on this topic. This means that Descartes’ immediately seems wrong in the context of the modern world. This does not, however, mean that Descartes is completely wrong. Descartes did highlight the importance of medicine in determining human nature and this should not be ignored when analyzing his works. There are many parts of human nature that do depend on medicine, just as Descartes ascertains in Discourse on the Method. We should also acknowledge that some parts of human nature have not been explained by science, such as the reason why genetically identical twins should have different personalities. This means that there may still be some truth in the views of Descartes on science, although it seems increasingly unlikely that we are composed of two types of matter in the way that Descartes suggests. We should always be careful not to completely ignore these types of philosophies, particularly as they may only seem wrong in the current scientific and philosophical context. Conclusion From the current perspective, it seems that Darwin has been continually proved right in his views on human nature, as science keeps giving more and more reasons for different parts of our personalities and psychologies. This should not be ignored when trying to find a ‘correct’ explanation for human nature, although some parts have not been fully explained. It seems from the analysis above that Descartes is mostly wrong in his view, although we should be careful not to discount it completely for he does have some interesting ideas about the nature of science. References Darwin, Charles. 1871. The Descent of Man: And Selection in Relation to Sex. J. Murray. Descartes, Rene. 2006. Discourse on Method. ReadHowYouWant.com. Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Descartes and Darwin Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Descartes and Darwin Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1447880-descartes-and-darwin
(Descartes and Darwin Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Descartes and Darwin Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1447880-descartes-and-darwin.
“Descartes and Darwin Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1447880-descartes-and-darwin.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Human Nature According Descartes and Darwin

Evaluating Various Psychological Issues

he spirit of enlightenment was derived from the intellectual and technical revolution which had occurred in the seventeenth century, with people like descartes and Newton.... Before the enlightenment age, it was presumed that the heavenly things operated according to the ancient method until Galileo and Copernicus established the way in which the solar system operated by use of mathematics and observations.... Scientists were confident of the capacity of science and human motive, convinced in the reliability of nature, taken with the idea of the move forward of civilization (Zafirovski, 2011)....
12 Pages (3000 words) Coursework

Evolution and Extraterrestrial Life

Hence, extraterrestrial life, according to scientists, would also have experienced a similar evolutionary process as countless earthly species have observed.... While most religions now recognize that the earth is just a lump of rock, they still believe that WE human beings are the most important thing in creation, that we occupy a special place in God's plan....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Platos view of a perfect world

According to Charles darwin, men may have noble qualities and god-like intelligence and yet 'men still bears in his bodily frame the inedible stamp of his lowly origin.... But according to Plato's The Republic, he considered a perfect state to have two things: the perfect man and the perfect justice....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Francis Bacon and Rene Descartes

The researcher of this paper "Francis Bacon and Rene descartes" concerns two famous artists.... Francis Bacon and Rene descartes are considered to be two fundamental thinkers, opposite in their approaches to epistemology and the philosophy of science.... Bacon's empirical method is based on perception and experiments, which knowledge is more reliable than the one proposed by descartes, based on rational deductive reasoning.... descartes' method or rational analysis of deduction is about thinking only....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The History of Evolution

We have come a long way in understanding darwin's theory of the evolution of man and the theories of great evolutionists before darwin and this knowledge of our past has helped us not only to understand our present but also throws light on our future.... he work of Charles darwin is considered the final word in the theory of evolution, but two millennia before him, the ancient Greeks had pondered over the same problem.... They were said to have 'survived, being accidentally compounded in a suitable way' according to Aristotle's exposition on Empedocles....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

The Nature of Mentality

The view was originally proposed by Rene descartes.... As per descartes, the mind can exist without a body and so is the case with the body.... descartes argues that since he can think it proves that he exists.... descartes argues in favor of God that is all-good and all-powerful.... descartes' argument about God as All-Good, All-Knowing, and All-Powerful is not palatable as Hume states that no empirical evidence is available to prove it....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Why God doesn't Exist

will set the ball rolling by citing the works of the 19th century scientist, Charles darwin.... The Scientific theory is also known as the Evolution or Darwinian Theory (darwin 12).... ) and the Quran (darwin, 19).... The former on the other hand, holds that, living things gradually and continuously changed from simple creatures or life forms to more complex ones over a long period of time (darwin, 31).... The process of change is what Charles darwin called evolution....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

How the Views and Approach of Socrates Might Be Relevant to Psychology Today

according to Lecture 2, p.... Socrates is among famous individuals in the classical era who is among scholars and movements that sought to explore issues based on morality within three main areas namely ontological inquiry into what exists, seeking to establish the nature of reality, an epistemological inquiry into the what and how people know and finally, ethical and practical inquiry.... The centrality of the method of critical inquiries in understanding the cause and nature of psychology is the most fundamental feature of science....
17 Pages (4250 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us